[Q1 Candidate Assessment] Template #15473
Description
[Insert candidate item description, e.g. iOS gallery captions]
Owner: [Name]
Links to context docs / Github issues (if applicable): [Insert / remove]
1. Direct impact on consolidation
Does this directly bring us closer to decommissioning duplicate platforms?
- Which legacy template/component does this help remove and how?
- Which migration milestone does it unblock?
Assessment: [Insert]
2. Reduces time, risk or cost of decommissioning
Does this meaningfully reduce the time, risk or cost of safe decommissioning?
- What aspect of the migration becomes faster or safer?
- Can we say roughly by how much?
- What evidence supports this?
Assessment: [Insert]
3. Mitigates material user-facing, security or operational risk
Material = user-facing errors/downtime, security exposure, reputational risk, significant operational challenges etc.
- What specific risk does this work mitigate?
- What's the likelihood and impact if the risk materialised?
- What happens if we don't address this in Q1?
Assessment: [Insert]
4. Estimated effort
Input what's currently known
- Size: [Insert rough take on # of people + sprints]
- Key dependencies: [Insert]
- Unknowns to consider: [Insert]
Recommendation
Based on the above, should this work be categorised as:
- Directly impacts consolidation
- Acceleration enabler / risk reducer
- Defer to stabilise / elevate phase
Rationale: [Insert]